Strategies for Water Management

Over the course of the ARB Initiative, a collaborative and diverse Working Group identified and assessed possible strategies for future and current actions for sustainable water management across the ARB. Here are a few water management approaches assessed through this process.

Effluent reuse

Effluent reuse of industrial or municipal effluent to reduce reliance on freshwater diagram

Enable reuse of industrial or municipal effluent to reduce reliance on freshwater

Strategy Description

Take return flows (treated wastewater) from industrial, municipal, or commercial operations and reuse that water for other industrial purposes. This approach supports development without needing to withdraw additional freshwater, while also reducing release of treated wastewater back into the river.

Possible Benefits

  • Takes pressure off smaller streams
  • May improve water quality for downstream users by reducing the treated effluent returned to the river
  • Could provide a back-up water source when fresh water systems are stressed 
  • Effluent suppliers can save on water treatment

Possible Trade-offs

  • Reduced tributary flows from reduced return flows might affect fish and aquatic species if implemented on a large scale 

Water conservation

Graphic of communities built near water

Continue to achieve water conservation and efficiency improvements as communities develop

Strategy Description

Promote conservation and efficiency practices for municipal, industrial, and commercial water use. This strategy aims to support future development without increasing the demand for freshwater across the entire basin. This strategy would focus heavily on reducing freshwater demand for industrial and commercial uses, as municipalities typically see a relatively high return rate so reductions in municipal water use would have less effect on river flow. 

Possible Benefits

Benefits would be proportional to the degree of conservation practiced.  Some benefits could include:

  • Increased walleye recruitment
  • Reduced water shortages
  • Reduction in instream flow need violations 

Possible Trade-offs

  • Expenses and effort required to implement conversation throughout basin
  • Some sectors might struggle to meet the conversation targets without experiencing diminishing returns 

On-stream storage

Explore new on-stream multi-purpose storage options

Strategy Description

On-stream storage refers to infrastructure built on the river with the capacity to alter flows, such as reservoirs and dams. This strategy includes further exploring new, multi-purpose storage opinions based on the needs of the basin and water users. 

Possible Benefits

  • Storage of water during high flow and releasing during low flow could help meet navigational flows, reduce shortages to licensed demands, and reduce Instream Flow Need violations
  • Potential for managing ice-jams
  • Fewer flood days for communities
  • Flexibility to deal with changing flows due to changing climate
  • Potential for hydropower generation

Possible Trade-offs

  • Infrastructure could negatively affect Indigenous communities, lands uses and sites, as well as cultural and recreational uses
  • Changing flow to the PAD
  • Sediment transport downstream of the reservoir
  • Possible reduction in spring and summer peak flows could impact riparian health and fish migration 

Off-stream storage

Develop new and existing off-stream storage sites to meet multiple basin water management objectives

Strategy Description

Off-stream storage refers to water-storing infrastructure (e.g., reservoirs, lakes) located away from the river and tributaries. This strategy includes further exploring new, multi-purpose storage opinions based on the needs of the basin and water users. 

Possible Benefits 

  • Potential reduction in shortages to water users
  • Meeting navigational flow targets
  • Higher winter streamflow to augment low flows
  • Potential for hydropower generation

Possible Trade-offs

  • Potential for negative impact on water quality and water temperature 

Existing infrastructure

Alter existing water storage infrastructure and operations to meet multiple basin water management objectives

Strategy Description

Alter existing water storage operations and infrastructure to meet multiple basin objectives for flexible water management. This includes examining lakes, dams, and smaller weirs and structures to increase the water management benefits. 

Possible Benefits

Benefits would depend on the current infrastructure and the suggested operational changes.

Possible Trade-offs

Trade-offs would depend on the current infrastructure and the suggested operational changes.

Environmental flows

Establish instream flow needs or similar targets for all tributaries in the basin as a precautionary water management measure

Strategy Description

Set Instream Flow Needs (IFNs) on some of the larger tributaries in the basin. This strategy includes investigating how often the targets would be met if a minimum flow was implemented and the volume of shortages that would result from flow target violations. This strategy is intended to proactively manage ecosystem health and naturalize streamflow. 

Possible Benefits

  • Fewer IFN violations in the basin
  • Increase seasonal naturalized streamflow
  • Increased walleye recruitment and fishery health
  • May increase the ability to meet navigation flow targets in dry conditions

Possible Trade-offs

  • Increase in water shortages for water users to meet IFN targets 

Navigational flows

Implement minimum flows to improve navigation in the lower Athabasca basin

Strategy Description

Implementing minimum navigational flows to improve navigation for Indigenous peoples on the Athabasca River. This strategy aims to meet navigational flows through water management as ideal minimum flows are not met naturally in many cases. 

Possible Benefits

  • Increased days where navigational flow targets are met
  • Increased walleye recruitment
  • Decreased days where IFN targets are violated

Possible Trade-offs

  • Upstream water users might be shorted during the spring and fall if reduced water use were needed to meet desired flow targets 

Land conservation

graphic of land with a tree, hill, and river

 Increase the quantity and improve the condition of conserved and restored land across the basin.

Strategy Description

Increase the amount and improve the condition of conserved and restored land across the basin, particularly in areas of high biodiversity or hydrologic importance. This strategy aims to maintain and improve hydrologic function and watershed health, while focusing on areas that have low value for resource development but still meet biodiversity targets. This will minimize the lost opportunity cost of protecting an area while still improving streamflow and water quality while providing for a well managed and intact landscape that can help to mitigate flooding, etc. 

Possible Benefits

  • Potential water quality improvements
  • A more natural landscape with potentially higher biodiversity
  • Potentially less alteration to the hydrological regime of the basin
  • Potentially fewer flood days
  • Potentially fewer IFN violations 

Possible Trade-offs

  • Industrial activity may move to other parts of the basin, impacting industrial footprint in other areas
  • Potential decrease in meeting navigational targets due to storing more water on the landscape
  • Potential increase in shortages under dry conditions 

Forestry practices

graphic of trees

Support practices in Forest Management Agreements that minimize hydrologic change.

Strategy Description

Implement sustainable forest management and stewardship to minimize hydrologic impacts of timber harvest. Forest canopies play a role in the watershed through evapotranspiration of precipitation, effects on snow accumulation and ablation, and influence on soil water storage. This strategy aims to improve sustainable forest management and stewardship to minimize hydrologic change. 

Possible Benefits

  • Reducing the potential to alter streamflow regimes by managing forest disturbance 

Possible Trade-offs

  • Possible impacts on timber supply, though efficiencies and innovative practices could help offset these effects 

Wetlands

graphic of 3 ponds

Avoid further wetland loss and functional impairment and promote more wetland restoration, education, and best management practices focused on minimizing impacts

Strategy Description

Avoiding wetland loss and promoting wetland restoration through the continued refinement, implementation, and enforcement of related legislation, policies, and mechanisms. Wetlands create unique and diverse habitats for a wide range of organisms, serving a vitally important role on the landscape. This strategy aims to maintain or improve the hydrological benefits of wetlands. 

Possible Benefits 

  • Decreased peak or flashy streamflows as a result of more storage of water in wetlands
  • Increase in overall ecosystem health, benefiting wildlife, hydrologic connectivity, and diversity
  • Extend residence time so that there are higher flows for longer periods through more a regulated baseflow 

Possible Trade-offs

  • Potential to add challenges to future development
  • Cost of reclaiming wetlands

Linear connectivity

Reclaim or deactivate linear features and reduce future linear disturbances in watersheds

Strategy Description

Reduce the total linear footprint on the landscape through mechanisms such as road and trail deactivation, seismic line reclamation, and restrictions on off-highway vehicle use. Linear features fragment the landscape and have the potential to interrupt hydrologic functions and ultimately affect streamflow. This strategy aims to reduce this interruption and to determine the hydrological impact of linear disturbances in terms of changes to streamflow. 

Possible Benefits

  • Low net benefit to streamflow but possible increase in water quality due to reduction in sediment runoff 

Possible Trade-offs

  • Potential to add challenges to future development
  • Cost to reclaim existing linear features 

Extraction industry reclamation

Continue to set and meet high standards of reclamation of extraction footprint to maintain or improve hydrological functions in a watershed.

Strategy Description

Support continued reclamation practices and enforcement in the extraction sector. This strategy aims to ensure mines and pits are reclaimed in a manner that restores or improves watershed functions and would apply wherever there is an extraction footprint in the basin. 

Possible Benefits 

  • Potential re-establishment of hydrologic functions, resulting in more natural streamflow regimes
  • Potential positive benefits for water quality and communities

Possible Trade-offs

  • Potential decrease in streamflow due to increased interception on the landscape 
Photograph of WaterPortal Board Member Ross Douglas

Ross Douglas

Board Member

Ross has extensive executive experience in Operations, Governance, Information Technology and Strategy at the board and senior management level including Mancal Corporation, Mancal Energy, Highridge Exploration and Atlantis Resources. He has worked in Oil and Gas, Coal, Commercial Real Estate, Portfolio Management, Recreation, Retail and Water and Wastewater Treatment. His experience is also geographically diverse having overseen operations in Canada, the United States, United Kingdom and Northern Ireland. Additionally, he has been on the board of companies with operations in Argentina, Azerbaijan, Barbados, Kazakhstan, and Russia. He has served on numerous Public, Private and Not for Profit Boards across a number of industries.

Ross has been active on several industry Boards and committees including the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP) and The Schulich School of Engineering Industry Advisory Council at the Schulich School of Engineering.

Photograph of WaterPortal Board Member Brian Mergelas

Brian Mergelas, PhD, ICD.D

Board Member

Brian is a seasoned Cleantech entrepreneur with a proven history of successfully bringing complex water technologies to the market.   With over 25 years of experience, he has led various organizations to achieve significant milestones in the industry. 

Having started as the founding CEO of the Pressure Pipe Inspection Company (PPIC) and later taking the helm at the Water Technology Acceleration Project (WaterTAP), Brian’s entrepreneurial spirit has been instrumental in driving innovation and growth within the sector. 

He is an active investor in the cleantech sector and has served on many boards including the Ontario Clean Water Agency. 

Actively engaged in industry associations like AWWA, WEF, IWA, and ASCE, Brian enjoys collaborating with fellow professionals to promote advancements in the field. 

Brian holds an undergraduate degree and a PhD in Physics from Queen’s University, which has provided him with a solid technical foundation.   As a member of the Institute of Corporate Directors, he brings valuable insights to corporate governance.