Groundwater Levels and Temporal Trends

Why are groundwater levels changing?

As indicated previously, the groundwater systems underlying our province are not static, and respond to the balance between supply (recharge) and demand (use). Human-induced influences such as groundwater withdrawal will have the obvious effect of lowering water levels in an aquifer, or aquifers depending on the degree of connectivity. These effects might manifest themselves locally, but can extend over larger areas under scenarios of intensive use or dewatering to support construction or mining activities.

Additionally, changes to the landscape occurring from alteration of the land cover can also have a significant influence on aquifer water levels by changing the ability of precipitation and melt-water to recharge the subsurface. For example, the differences in soil moisture conditions and potential for groundwater recharge can be significant between more shaded, forest covered areas as opposed to grassland areas or cultivated land.

The image (below) shows a LANDSAT image taken from an area within the Beaver River Basin showing the differences in land cover (top panel) and the resulting soil moisture conditions (lower panel).

Outside of these human effects, there are large-scale climatic effects that can have a significant influence on the hydrology of Alberta Basins. In particular, there are two influencing climate phenomena that can have an influence on provincial water supplies. The first of these phenomena is the El Niño Southern Oscillation, or ENSO, which has a return period of two to seven years and can last anywhere from six to eighteen months during its various phases. The warm El Niño phase tends to bring increased temperatures and reduced precipitation conditions during the various seasons. The opposite of the El Niño phase is the La Niña phase, which tends to bring generally cooler and wetter conditions to Alberta.

Typical climatic responses to El Niño and La Niña events indicate the general departure of temperature and precipitation from seasonal normals.

Historical PDO index values and response of river flows to PDO cycles.

Another longer timescale phenomenon that influences climatic conditions in Alberta is the Pacific Decadal Oscillation. The Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) is a climate phenomenon believed to be caused by a large scale sea-surface temperature pattern of the North Pacific Ocean that affects the jet stream over North America. This climatic event operates on a return cycle of 25 to 30 years between positive (warmer and drier) and negative (cooler and wetter) phases. Learn more, about the various PDO, El Niño and La Niña events that have occurred since 1950.

Research and knowledge of the PDO phenomenon is a developing area (Kiffney, Bull and Feller 2002) and the full effects on Alberta’s water resources is currently under research. Needless to say, seasonal variability in average temperatures and amounts of precipitation received to the various basins in Alberta will have a notable effect on recharge conditions, and hence groundwater levels within Alberta’s unconfined and confined aquifers.

A review of the effects that the PDO has on river flow characteristics was completed by Rood et al. (2005) for various river gauging stations in Alberta and northernmost Montana. The results provided in this assessment showed some degree of correlation between this climate phenomenon and the deviation of flow conditions from the mean flow of each river. Click on the image (above) to learn more, about how this deviation from mean flow has manifested itself over the various phases of the PDO for each river, with higher mean flows tending to occur during cooler (wetter) phases of the PDO and lower mean flows occurring during warmer (drier) phases.

There is also some evidence to suggest that the PDO may have some influence on snowpack conditions in certain headwater areas of the eastern slopes.

Pacific Decal Oscillation

What’s been happening over the years?

To date, an assessment of the effects of the ENSO and PDO cycles on groundwater resources beneath Alberta has not been completed. Nevertheless, Alberta Environment operates a groundwater observation well network within the province that has been operating at least since the mid-1980s and in some cases the period of record for certain wells has been shown to extend further back to the mid-1970s.

A review of available hydrographs for selected wells located within the various major basins of Alberta was completed as part of this study to assess temporal trends and the possible influence of climatic events like the ENSO and PDO phases. Unfortunately, the periods of record for the majority of wells does not extend far enough back in time to resolve such influences with any degree of confidence. However, some apparent trends are noticeable following a review of the records on file. View a summary of general water level trends (by major river basin) extending over the period of 1989 to 2009.

  • In general, variable to increasing trends in water levels, and hence volumes of groundwater storage in the various basins, is evident for the period preceding 1997. The majority of the 37 monitoring wells assessed across the various basins indicate increasing trends (58%) or variable trends (31%) during the period of records, as opposed to decreasing trends (31%), with the magnitude of changes ranging from 0.5 to 2 m.
  • Subsequent to 1997, a propensity for decreasing water level trends is evident, with 81 of the 37 wells showing declines from peak 1997 levels ranging anywhere from 0.5 to 2.5 m. However, trends since 2004 show a return to increasing levels, with a clear majority of wells (68%) showing increases in water levels from 0.2 to 2.0 m.
  • When assessing the overall general trend in water levels since 1989, the results show mixed responses with both increasing and decreasing trends (41% of wells showing increasing water levels ranging from 0.4 to 1.1 m and 35% of wells showing declining water levels from 0.1 to 1.5 m).

Although general trends in the historical groundwater level records appear across the province, the connection to climatic events such as the ENSO and PDO cycles still is unclear, and suffers from a lack of sufficient information. Nevertheless, the preceding review does demonstrate the dynamic nature of groundwater in response to changing conditions, and the need for continued monitoring to assess connections with climate cycles and changing conditions, and the associated vulnerability in response to supply and demand patterns and land use practices.

Photograph of WaterPortal Board Member Ross Douglas

Ross Douglas

Board Member

Ross has extensive executive experience in Operations, Governance, Information Technology and Strategy at the board and senior management level including Mancal Corporation, Mancal Energy, Highridge Exploration and Atlantis Resources. He has worked in Oil and Gas, Coal, Commercial Real Estate, Portfolio Management, Recreation, Retail and Water and Wastewater Treatment. His experience is also geographically diverse having overseen operations in Canada, the United States, United Kingdom and Northern Ireland. Additionally, he has been on the board of companies with operations in Argentina, Azerbaijan, Barbados, Kazakhstan, and Russia. He has served on numerous Public, Private and Not for Profit Boards across a number of industries.

Ross has been active on several industry Boards and committees including the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP) and The Schulich School of Engineering Industry Advisory Council at the Schulich School of Engineering.

Photograph of WaterPortal Board Member Brian Mergelas

Brian Mergelas, PhD, ICD.D

Board Member

Brian is a seasoned Cleantech entrepreneur with a proven history of successfully bringing complex water technologies to the market.   With over 25 years of experience, he has led various organizations to achieve significant milestones in the industry. 

Having started as the founding CEO of the Pressure Pipe Inspection Company (PPIC) and later taking the helm at the Water Technology Acceleration Project (WaterTAP), Brian’s entrepreneurial spirit has been instrumental in driving innovation and growth within the sector. 

He is an active investor in the cleantech sector and has served on many boards including the Ontario Clean Water Agency. 

Actively engaged in industry associations like AWWA, WEF, IWA, and ASCE, Brian enjoys collaborating with fellow professionals to promote advancements in the field. 

Brian holds an undergraduate degree and a PhD in Physics from Queen’s University, which has provided him with a solid technical foundation.   As a member of the Institute of Corporate Directors, he brings valuable insights to corporate governance.