Dry dams are catchment areas that have been designed to hold excess water in times of flooding and allow water to move freely in normal conditions. This is a short term flood mitigation solution that stores water for approximately 24 to 48 hours before slowly releasing the water to prevent downstream flooding. There are no permanent areas for holding water, which is why these structures are called “dry dams” [1].This form of flood mitigation is useful for smaller, more frequent floods that can erode river banks [2].
Dry dams are designed to retain excess flood water for a short-period of time (24-48 hours). Once the time has lapsed the water is then released at a slow and controlled rate through gates located at the outlet. While dry dams on their own would only be capable of addressing smaller floods, this mitigation method combined with other strategies, such as larger reservoir dams, have the potential to mitigate for larger floods such as those seen in 2013 [3].
Dry dams are not currently built in Alberta, however, a Government of Alberta feasibility study is currently underway to determine whether or not this form of flood mitigation could be used.
This following is a dry-dam located in Ohio.
Construction costs to build a dry dam vary depending on size and landscaping requirements, therefore, it is difficult to discern a specific cost. Also, regular maintenance and upgrading costs are needed which, range from 3 to 5% of the original construction costs and must occur every 10 to 20 years. Maintenance requires unclogging sediment and removing overgrowth [4]. For example, after major flooding in Miami in 1913 a system of five dry dams was built to retain flood waters and prevent future damage. This original system cost $30.36 million to construct. In today’s dollars, this system of dry dams would cost $912 million to replace [5].
Construction start and completion dates depend on how many dry dams are being built and their size. For example, the five dry dams constructed on the Miami River took five years to construct [6].
Dry dams are considered a long-term, permanent flood mitigation strategy. Maintenance is required especially after the event of a flood or storm surge to remove debris and sediment deposits.
Risks associated with the construction and use of dry dams include; structural and hydraulic design, sediment management, water quality, clogging problems due to debris, and ecosystem and land-use issues in the surrounding area [7]. Lastly, ongoing costs for maintenance and upgrading can be significant.
Given the design of dry dams as a short-term retention area for excess water, this inundation can lead to the loss of vegetation, forests and natural areas. To prevent adverse impacts to the local environment and biodiversity, dry dams should be built to accommodate both regular and rare floods, which require large storage capacity [8]. The local watershed can also be impacted due to interruption of the sediment transport process. River flows carry sediment downstream for aquatic species and erosion prevention. Interrupting this process can cause turbidity issues downstream and soil erosion on riverbanks [9].
Dry dam infrastructure cannot mitigate for drought given the design of the infrastructure to hold excess water and manage flooding.
We provide Canadian educational resources on water practices to promote conservation and sustainability. Our team crafts current and relevant content, while encouraging feedback and engagement.
The Canada WaterPortal is a registered charity, #807121876RR0001
We recognize and respect the sovereignty of the Indigenous Peoples and communities on whose land our work takes place.
© 2024 All Rights Reserved.
Ross has extensive executive experience in Operations, Governance, Information Technology and Strategy at the board and senior management level including Mancal Corporation, Mancal Energy, Highridge Exploration and Atlantis Resources. He has worked in Oil and Gas, Coal, Commercial Real Estate, Portfolio Management, Recreation, Retail and Water and Wastewater Treatment. His experience is also geographically diverse having overseen operations in Canada, the United States, United Kingdom and Northern Ireland. Additionally, he has been on the board of companies with operations in Argentina, Azerbaijan, Barbados, Kazakhstan, and Russia. He has served on numerous Public, Private and Not for Profit Boards across a number of industries.
Ross has been active on several industry Boards and committees including the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP) and The Schulich School of Engineering Industry Advisory Council at the Schulich School of Engineering.
Brian is a seasoned Cleantech entrepreneur with a proven history of successfully bringing complex water technologies to the market. With over 25 years of experience, he has led various organizations to achieve significant milestones in the industry.
Having started as the founding CEO of the Pressure Pipe Inspection Company (PPIC) and later taking the helm at the Water Technology Acceleration Project (WaterTAP), Brian’s entrepreneurial spirit has been instrumental in driving innovation and growth within the sector.
He is an active investor in the cleantech sector and has served on many boards including the Ontario Clean Water Agency.
Actively engaged in industry associations like AWWA, WEF, IWA, and ASCE, Brian enjoys collaborating with fellow professionals to promote advancements in the field.
Brian holds an undergraduate degree and a PhD in Physics from Queen’s University, which has provided him with a solid technical foundation. As a member of the Institute of Corporate Directors, he brings valuable insights to corporate governance.